Lewin’s and Kotter’s Models and Conflict Resolution During Organizational Change

Introduction

Each business that wants to survive in today’s market must master the art of change management. Based on the research, experts have come up with several important suggestions for efficient change management that can improve the performance of businesses. Businesses must create a compelling vision for change that will inspire employees, explain the reasoning behind the change, and serve as a decision-making framework for everybody involved in the transition.

Stakeholders should be informed of this vision, and a sense of urgency should be established to motivate employees and other interested parties to work toward achieving it. Businesses should involve their staff and other relevant parties in the transition to boost buy-in, enthusiasm, and a sense of ownership. There must be clear and consistent communication between all parties involved in the change so that everyone is on the same page about its goals and how they may contribute to achieving them.

A detailed change management plan outlining objectives, timeframes, resources, and performance metrics should be created to steer the change process. Change management plans can be improved by constantly assessing and adjusting their efficacy in light of findings. The selected organization can set itself up for future success and maintain its competitive edge by implementing the advice outlined in this study.

Strategic Behavior Modification and Organizational Change Management

Conflict is an inherent aspect of any workplace. If not managed successfully, it may lead to bad effects, including low morale, decreased productivity, and a toxic work environment. If you manage conflict effectively, you can avoid these negative consequences. One of the most important functions of management is conflict resolution, which allows for the management of employee behavior, which in turn contributes to a good working environment and increases productivity.

The settlement of disputes requires first determining their underlying causes, then gaining an awareness of the various kinds of conflicts that can arise, and then developing and putting into action resolution techniques. This article investigates the concept of regulating employee behavior in the workplace through conflict resolution and how this concept contributes to the success of organizations.

Organization theory, known as “change management,” focuses on adopting organizational changes, such as a new system, method, or culture. Change management is a subset of organization theory. Understanding the forces that drive change, determining how it will affect people, effectively conveying it, and assisting employees as they transition are all components of change management (Blay et al., 2019).

When efficiently controlling employee behavior in the workplace through conflict resolution, having a solid understanding of organization theory and change management is necessary. The study of change management is critical for businesses that want to maintain their competitive edge and successfully adjust to shifting conditions in the business environment (Christensen et al., 2020). It allows businesses to recognize shifting client preferences, technological developments, and industry trends and adapt.

If effective change management is used, an improved level of employee engagement, productivity, and overall performance can contribute to an organization’s success. On the other hand, ineffective change management can result in opposition from employees, greater costs, and a decline in the company’s competitiveness (Caesens et al., 2019). In the fast-paced and ever-changing modern business environment, companies need to have a solid understanding of the concepts of change management and how these ideas connect to employee behavior management through conflict resolution.

Understanding Change Management in Organization Theory

Lewin’s Change Management and Kotter’s Eight-Step Change Models

Successful organizational change results from meticulous planning and management of a multifaceted process. Success criteria for implementing change have been the subject of extensive theoretical study in organization theory, where change management has garnered great attention.

Lewin’s Change Management Model is a seminal theory in this area; it suggests a three-stage method for introducing change: unfreezing, modifying, and refreezing (Cone & Unni, 2020). To unfreeze an organization, you must sow the seeds of discontent with the status quo. Refreezing entails consolidating the change so that it becomes ingrained in the organization’s culture for good, whereas the process entails implementing the actual change (Caputo et al., 2019).

Kotter’s Eight-Step Change Model is another influential theory that stresses the need for a feeling of urgency, forming a guiding coalition, and disseminating the change vision to all affected parties (Caputo et al., 2019). The strategy also emphasizes giving workers the leeway to implement the transformation vision and scoring quick victories along the way to keep morale high.

While attempting to implement effective change initiatives, organizations need to have a firm grasp of the theoretical literature around change management in the context of organizational theory (Chowdhury & Chandra Shil, 2022). Drawing on these understandings, businesses can create more efficient transformation plans with higher odds of success. Organizational effectiveness can be increased through change management, which entails implementing and overseeing said changes (Chowdhury & Chandra Shil, 2022). In order to make a smooth transfer, familiarity with change management principles is essential.

Organizations today cannot survive in a rapidly evolving business climate without a dedicated change management strategy. One of the most important parts of managing change is teaching people how to act as change agents inside their organizations (Dörfler & Stierand, 2020). When employees are empowered, they feel like the process of change is something they have a stake in. If people feel they have a say in shaping the changes, they are more likely to accept and champion them. Empowered workers own the transformation and help propel it forward. However, there are times when top-down change initiatives must be implemented.

Forcing employees to adapt may be necessary for organizations when workers are resistant to change. When this happens, the management team is responsible for driving the transformation process and gaining the support of the workforce. The way an organization acts can have a major effect on how effectively change is introduced.

Change can be encouraged and more likely to succeed in an environment with a strong emphasis on invention, collaboration, and open lines of communication (Dörfler & Stierand, 2020). Businesses that promote innovation and take risks are more open to change and can quickly adjust to changing circumstances. Keeping everyone on the same page during the transition requires constant and clear communication.

Types of Conflicts in the Workplace

Interpersonal and Organizational Conflicts

Disputes between coworkers are common and almost always have undesirable outcomes, such as a decrease in output and morale in the workplace. Dissimilarities in personality, communication styles, values, and points of view are all significant sources of friction in interpersonal relationships. When, for example, an introverted worker is teamed with an extroverted worker who thrives on social contact and team tasks, conflicts may ensue (Dörfler & Stierand, 2020).

On the other hand, tensions can arise in the workplace when people with different priorities, degrees of authority, or available resources come into conflict with one another. Conflict can arise when, for example, two departments have different priorities or when there is competition for the same resources.

Competition for the same resources can also bring about conflict when employees are unable to collaborate productively with one another, and productivity declines, which in turn hurts the organization’s bottom line. Conflict resolution is a method that may be used to regulate employee behavior. However, for managers to succeed in doing so, they need to have a solid understanding of the numerous types of disputes that can emerge in the workplace (Dörfler & Stierand, 2020). In that case, it will be in a better position to devise strategies that effectively address challenges and stop them from snowballing into more serious issues.

Managing Employee Behavior Through Conflict Resolution

The effective management of employee behavior and the success of an organization are directly correlated to the use of conflict resolution strategies. Conflicts in the workplace are unavoidable since individuals’ points of view, beliefs, and values diverge widely from one another. The capacity to influence employee behavior through conflict resolution is essential to your efforts to preserve a positive and productive atmosphere at work (Kammerhoff et al., 2019).

Successfully resolving disagreements at work is essential to maintaining a high level of morale and productivity. Divergent worldviews and priorities are two examples of elements that might contribute to the emergence of disagreements (Kammerhoff et al., 2019). Conflicts between employees that are not resolved can substantially negatively influence the overall morale of an organization, its productivity, and, ultimately, its level of success.

A conflict that is successfully resolved makes employees feel that their voices are being heard and appreciated and increases workplace innovation, creativity, and productivity. Successfully resolving the disagreements that crop up between staff members would lead to a workplace environment that is more upbeat and harmonious (Khan et al., 2019).

Two different kinds of disputes arise in the workplace: interpersonal and organizational. Dissimilarities in personality, communication styles, and value systems are all factors that might contribute to the emergence of interpersonal conflict. Several factors, such as competition for resources, authority, and goals, can be linked back to the origins of conflicts that occur in the workplace. When supervisors and employees are at odds with one another, it can hurt worker morale and output. When internal friction undermines a company’s ability to execute its job, it can hurt its efficiency and competitiveness.

Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument

The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument is a theoretical framework that can be used to make informed decisions about how to approach the resolution of a conflict (TKI). The five methods for dealing with conflicts that the TKI model identifies are consistent with those discussed earlier in this section (Schulz-Knappe et al., 2019). There are many strategies, such as competing, cooperating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. The degree to which an individual is assertive and agreeable are the two most significant criteria to consider when deciding which mode to use.

A defining characteristic of assertiveness is the capacity to defend one’s demands and interests, even in the face of opposition from others. The willingness to consider the priorities and requirements of another person or group is an essential component of cooperation (Smith & Read, 2020). When it comes to conflict resolution, the paradigm suggests emphasizing both assertiveness and cooperation as top priorities. Since everyone’s objectives and concerns are taken into account during a collaborative effort, everyone who participates in the effort benefits.

One of the most powerful arguments against competitive techniques is the contention that they foster aggressive conduct rather than a collaborative approach to problem-solving (Schulz-Knappe et al., 2019). However, accommodation emphasizes giving in rather than standing fast, which can lead to a situation where neither side can go forward. Because it needs to find a middle ground between being aggressive and being cooperative, it is possible to wind up on the losing end of a compromise (Schulz-Knappe et al., 2019). The avoidance technique, which entails a lack of assertiveness and cooperation, may lead to a lose-lose situation in which the issue is not addressed, and tensions continue to escalate.

Dealing with Change in the Workplace

Strategies for Addressing Workplace Conflict During Transitional Periods

It is essential to successfully regulate employee behavior through the use of conflict resolution in order to maintain a workplace that is both healthy and productive. Conflicts in the workplace are on the rise due to the increasingly complicated nature of today’s modern business environment and the diverse makeup of the workforce.

So, for organizations to be successful in confronting this challenge straight on, they need to employ strategies for conflict resolution that create an environment that is trustworthy, open to communication, and cooperative (White et al., 2020). The most effective strategies for resolving conflicts in the workplace include putting in place clear norms and procedures, encouraging employees to report conflicts through the introduction of an open-door policy, and providing training on how to resolve conflicts for every employee.

The Significance of Efficient Communication During Transitional Periods

It is of the utmost importance to develop a culture that encourages open conversation and attentive listening by employing an effective communication strategy. Increasing employee morale and performance, lowering employee turnover, and improving the company’s image can all be accomplished through dispute resolution as a tool for managing employee behavior (White et al., 2020). Several companies have learned how tough it is to adjust to change in the workplace through their personal experiences.

The awareness that transformation cannot be imposed from on high without the buy-in of all employees and other interested parties is crucial for firms to come to terms with. If employees perceive that their input is valued, they are more likely to welcome change and help contribute to the successful implementation of the change. The benefit of having patience and staying persistent in the face of change is something that corporations have also learned. If the transfer to the new system is rushed, there is an increased risk of increased resistance and pushback from employees. Changing the culture of a business is not a simple undertaking, and there are likely to be numerous roadblocks to the successful implementation of change.

Overcoming Workplace Resistance to Change

The resistance shown by workers is a significant barrier. Workers may resist change because of the disturbance it produces and the requirement to learn new procedures (White et al., 2020). This stubbornness can manifest in various ways, including outright disobedience of authority or passive-aggressive behavior, for example. It is possible that certain companies will experience difficulties as a result of a lack of available finance. Bringing about change often requires significant time, energy, and money, in addition to other resources. A lack of resources could hinder an organization’s ability to execute change successfully. Not the least of the difficulties is that it can be hard to articulate themselves.

Throughout the transformation process, if efficient communication is not maintained, it might result in resistance, misunderstandings, and false information. The reasoning behind the change, the outcomes that are expected, and the steps that will be taken to bring about the transformation ought to be communicated in an open and forthright manner by organizations. A variety of strategies are available for organizations to use in effectively managing change (White et al., 2020).

One common strategy entails including the workforce in the change process. The staff should be given opportunities to provide feedback and suggestions throughout the transition, and they should be provided with training and assistance to help them adjust to the changes that are occurring. In addition, organizations may cultivate a sense of utmost importance about the changeover. In light of the shift, this can stimulate workers and offer them a common aim to work toward.

Organizations must provide generous assistance to their employees as they adjust to new circumstances. At this time of change, additional training, counseling, or other support services may be made available to staff members, depending on their requirements. By providing aid and resources, organizations can reduce the opposition they face and raise their chances of success (White et al., 2020).

As a result, it is essential to ensure that they take their time and give the situation good thought before reacting to changes in the workplace. Organizations need to be patient and persistent in their efforts, incorporate all important parties, provide clear information, and support others. If organizations follow these steps while implementing change, they will be able to build a workplace that is both more dynamic and more resilient.

Recommendations for Effective Change Management

Companies unable to properly manage change will find it increasingly difficult to adapt to changing conditions and keep their competitive edge. This difficulty will only increase over time. Within academia and the professional world, various writings may be discovered that offer advice on how to deal with change. In order to effectively manage change, the first step is to formulate a shared vision for the foreseeable future that everyone can rally around.

According to Kotter’s Change Model, one of the eight essential components necessary for successfully implementing a change is having a clear vision of where they want to end up after the process (Laig & Abocejo, 2021). People need to be inspired and motivated to work toward the stated goals of the transformation when they read a well-written vision statement.

It is essential to convey to the workforce a compelling vision if they want them to acknowledge the need for change and feel motivated to make positive contributions to accomplishing the organization’s goals. If businesses have a clear and well-defined goal for the change, they can use it as a guide to help them make decisions as they move along in the process. It provides workers with a sense of purpose and motivates them to make decisions to help the organization achieve its ultimate goals (Laig & Abocejo, 2021). The significance of having a well-articulated vision is illustrated by the fact that it makes people more likely to accept change if they know the logic behind it.

This highlights the significance of having a well-articulated vision. According to research conducted by Prosci, an established organization specializing in change management research, the most important factor in the success of change initiatives is a distinct and alluring vision (Komodromos et al., 2019).

According to the study, employees are more likely to support an effort to bring about change when they know the logic for the change and can see how it would benefit them (Komodromos et al., 2019). As a result, any group that is serious about successfully delivering change should make it one of their key goals to build a clear and appealing vision. Instilling a sense of urgency is one of the most important factors in completing any organizational transformation.

The core of his argument is that people will not adapt their behavior or make an effort to change a priority unless they perceive the situation to be an emergency. In order to generate this feeling of immediacy, organizations need to present a compelling argument for why the change is necessary and the consequences of doing nothing about it. Sharing facts and information that emphasize the need for change, such as declining sales, increasing competition, or evolving customer wants, is one method that can be used to accomplish this goal (Komodromos et al., 2019). Another key stage in getting people on board with the shift is making them feel as though time is of the essence.

Employees may push back against the endeavor to execute change if they are not provided with a solid justification for the shift. To counteract this, leaders should emphasize the benefits of the change for the group as a whole and for each team member. In this approach, it is possible to highlight topics like opportunities for promotion, increased job stability, and a better balance between work and personal life (Rahim & Katz, 2019).

Engaging stakeholders in the change process is also essential to developing a sense of urgency in the situation. Cameron and Quinn concluded that increasing key stakeholders’ involvement in the transition process enhanced the likelihood of successful implementation (Rahim & Katz, 2019). This may mean incorporating them in the decision-making process or soliciting their feedback and suggestions in some other way.

Engaging Key Players in the Changeover

In the process of change management, one of the most important steps is to involve stakeholders in the change process. Doing so helps to develop support for the change and increases buy-in from those who will be most affected by the change. According to the Stakeholder Theory, it is an organization’s obligation not just to maximize profits for its shareholders but to create value for all of its stakeholders, employees, customers, and suppliers (Freeman et al., 2021). An organization can better address its stakeholders’ concerns, prepare for any potential opposition, and cultivate a sense of shared ownership over the change if it involves those stakeholders in the process of change.

The ability to communicate effectively is another essential component of successful change management. Marshall McLuhan, a theorist of communication, is credited with coining the phrase “the medium is the message,” which means that the manner in which information is delivered is just as significant as the material being expressed (John-Eke & Akintokunbo, 2020).

As a result, communication needs to be crystal clear, consistent and adapted to the specific requirements of various stakeholders. In addition, there needs to be a two-way flow of communication, which enables various stakeholders to provide input and ask questions (Kukielko-Rogozinska, 2021). A comprehensive change management plan is another necessary component of effective change management, and its development is one of those essential components.

Benefits of Effective Change Management in the Organization

Several scholars have devoted their time and energy to researching and discussing the topic of organizational change management. According to Kotter, for example, effective change management raises productivity and employee excitement levels while simultaneously lowering opposition levels to the change being implemented. In addition, Prosci emphasizes the significance of effective change management in cultivating stakeholder ties and increasing the competitiveness of businesses (Reinecke & Donaghey, 2020).

Both Cameron and Green emphasize the need for change management in assisting organizations in adjusting to the ever-shifting opportunities and dangers they are confronted with (Murray et al., 2020). Increased productivity is one of the many benefits of effective change management, but it is also one of the most obvious. Businesses skilled in change management are better positioned to find solutions to challenges and seize opportunities. Effective change management can also raise morale and dedication among workers. This is accomplished by involving employees in the transition and giving them a stake in the outcome.

Consequently, employees may become more invested in their work and offer improved outcomes for the organization. Employees and other stakeholders in a company will occasionally push back against changes that are implemented. Effective change management can help reduce resistance to the change by boosting people’s buy-in and resolving any concerns or objections individuals may have about the change (Reinecke & Donaghey, 2020). If this is done, then employees and any other stakeholders who have a stake in the outcome of the change would likely gain from having a greater understanding of the change and their role in bringing it about.

Increasing the number of stakeholders in the transformation process can lead to increased collaboration and cooperation and strengthen the relationships between stakeholders. Improved change management can also help a company become more competitive since it makes it easier for employees to adjust to shifting conditions in the business world. In today’s fast-paced and ever-changing economic environment, businesses that are nimble enough to shift gears and readjust their strategies quickly stand a better chance of succeeding.

Professional Literature on Improvements that the Organization Should Implement

Recent professional and peer-reviewed writings provide a wealth of material from which to develop various recommendations for enhancing the change management procedures of the selected organization. According to the Harvard Business Review, having a vision that is crystal clear and compelling is one of the essential components of successful change management (White et al., 2020).

The ability to offer employees a feeling of purpose and concentration during the transition can be facilitated by having a clearly defined end goal as well as a succinct explanation of the reason for the change. The establishment of open channels of communication and consultation, the solicitation of comments and contributions, and the promotion of active participation in decision-making can accomplish this objective (Reinecke & Donaghey, 2020). Firms enjoy greater levels of success when they actively involve key stakeholders in the change management process.

Conclusion

Businesses and other organizations cannot succeed without actively managing change. Companies can successfully implement change if they develop a compelling vision, establish a sense of urgency, involve key stakeholders in the process, communicate the change clearly, and have a comprehensive plan to manage the transition. Good change management can lead to several positive outcomes, including more productivity, greater employee buy-in, less resistance to change, stronger relationships with stakeholders, and increased competitiveness.

Change is never easy, but with the right approach to managing it, businesses can weather the storm and come out on the other side even stronger and more successful. Successful companies in today’s volatile and uncertain business climate prioritize effective change management to meet their goals and maintain a competitive edge.

References

Blay, K. B., Tuuli, M. M., & France-Mensah, J. (2019). Managing change in bim-level two projects: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(5), 581–596. Web.

Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., Demoulin, S., De Wilde, M., & Mierop, A. (2019). Perceived organizational support and workplace conflict: The mediating role of failure-related trust. Frontiers in Psychology, p. 9. Web.

Caputo, A., Marzi, G., Maley, J., & Silic, M. (2019). Ten years of conflict management research 2007-2017. International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(1), 87–110. Web.

Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Røvik, K. A. (2020). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture, and myth. Routledge.

Chowdhury, A., & Chandra Shil, N. (2022). Understanding change management in the organizational context: Revisiting literature. Management and Entrepreneurship: Trends of Development, 1(19), 28–43. Web.

Cone, C., & Unni, E. (2020). Achieving consensus using a modified Delphi technique embedded in Lewin’s Change Management Model designed to improve faculty satisfaction in a pharmacy school. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(12), 1711–1717. Web.

Dörfler, V., & Stierand, M. (2020). Bracketing: A phenomenological theory applied through transpersonal reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(4), 778–793. Web.

Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757–1770. Web.

John-Eke, E. C., & Akintokunbo, O. O. (2020). Conflict Management as a tool for increasing organizational effectiveness: A review of literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5). Web.

Kammerhoff, J., Lauenstein, O., & Schütz, A. (2019). Leading toward harmony – different types of conflict mediate how followers’ perceptions of transformational leadership are related to job satisfaction and performance. European Management Journal, 37(2), 210–221. Web.

Khan, S. A., Kaviani, M. A., J. Galli, B., & Ishtiaq, P. (2019). Application of continuous improvement techniques to improve organization performance. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(2), 542–565. Web.

Komodromos, M., Halkias, D., & Harkiolakis, N. (2019). Managers’ perceptions of trust in the workplace in times of strategic change. EuroMed Journal of Business, 14(1), 2–20. Web.

Kukielko-Rogozinska, K. (2021). Twelve insights into the Afghanistan War through the photographs from the Basetrack Project: Rita Leistner’s iProbes and Marshall McLuhan’s theory of Media. Arts, 10(2), 27. Web.

Laig, R. B., & Abocejo, F. T. (2021). Change management process in a mining company: Kotter’s 8-step change model. Journal of Management, Economics, and Industrial Organization, 31–50. Web.

Murray, M., Woodside, S., & Braunscheidel, M. (2020). Project management and change management: Working together for effective organizational change. The BRC Academy Journal of Business, 10(1), 83–111. Web.

Rahim, M. A., & Katz, J. P. (2019). Forty years of conflict: The effects of gender and generation on conflict-management strategies. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(1), 1–16. Web.

Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2020). Political CSR at the Coalface – the roles and contradictions of multinational corporations in developing workplace dialogue. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 457–486. Web.

Schulz-Knappe, C., Koch, T., & Beckert, J. (2019). The importance of communicating change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(4), 670–685. Web.

Smith, A. C., Skinner, J., & Read, D. (2020). Philosophies of organizational change: perspectives, models, and theories for managing change. Edward Elgar Publishing.

White, B. A., White, H. D., Bledsoe, C., Hendricks, R., & Arroliga, A. C. (2020). Conflict management education in the intensive care unit. American Journal of Critical Care, 29(6). Web.

Removal Request
A real student has written this essay about Lewin’s and Kotter’s Models and Conflict Resolution During Organizational Change and owns intellectual rights to it. If you plan to use this work for research purposes, make sure to include an according citation.
Request to Remove Content

If you are the content owner and don’t want it to be available on our website anymore, feel free to send us a removal request. We’ll fulfill it after reviewing.

Send the Request