The Importance of Accounting

We will compute the overhead and total cost per product using the traditional costing method.

Thus, total cost = the cost for each product.

By implication, total cost (Widgets) = Direct labor cost + direct material cost +overhead cost (Cooper and Kaplan 43).

Therefore, the total cost (widgets) = 100,000 + 100,000 + 200,000 = $400,000

This computation solves problem 1 and 2.

Manufacturing Cost ($) Gadgets ($) Widgets ($) Smidgets ($) Smadgets ($)
Direct material 200,000 100,000 150,000 250,000
Direct labor 300,000 100,000 400,000 200,000
Overhead cost 600,000 200,000 800,000 400,000
Total cost 1,100,000 400,000

We can calculate the ABC of the case study using the overhead rates.

ABC = overhead cost x total units per driver.

Overhead cost Estimated cost Cost drivers/activity ABC overhead rates
Rent 1,000,000 100,0000 10
Set-up 700,000 1000 700
Depreciation 300,000 3000 100

We can calculate the ABC of the case study using the overhead rates and expected cost drivers.

ABC = overhead cost x product expected cost

Overhead Cost ($) Gadgets ($) Widgets ($) Smidgets ($) Smadgets ($)
Depreciation 90,000 50,000 40,000 120,000
Set-up 210,000 140,000 70,000 280,000
Rent 300,000 200,000 100,000 400,000
Total overhead cost 600,000 390,000 210,000 800,000

The sum of the overhead cost and cost drivers per product = total cost per product

Thus, we will use the total overhead cost in the above calculation.

Manufacturing Cost ($) Gadgets ($) Widgets ($) Smidgets ($) Smadgets ($)
Direct material 200,000 100,000 150,000 250,000
Direct labor 300,000 100,000 400,000 200,000
Overhead cost 600,000 390,000 210,000 800,000
Total cost 1,100,000 590,000 760,000 1,250,000

The case study revealed that Smagets was under-priced, however, Gadgets, Widgets and Smidgets were mispriced. Smidgets were overrated by $590,000. Gadget was evaluated accurately. The value for TCA and ABC was $1,100,000. Various administrative troubles emerge from inaccurately budgeting distinctive product offerings.

Mispriced items lead to one-sided execution correlations (Compton 33). Traditional costing additionally doles out overhead expenses without shifting overhead requests between offices. The outcome is that administration has more trouble evaluating overhead costs that will diminish the firm’s general expense (Hicks 45).

The most consistent methodology is for the CFO to propose embracing activity based costing. The corporation would acknowledge $400,000 in investment funds, which could be utilized in executing the ABC framework. ABC costing would relegate spending plans different product lines and permit administration to evaluate proficiency and cost decreasing options.

The traditional costing strategy does not consider differing overhead prerequisites between items. Traditional costing utilizes one overhead rate in light of recorded overhead costs for the whole fabricating process. A solitary overhead rate cannot reveal the cost difference per unit overhead costs, which affect the budget process. Activity-based costing appoints overhead rates in view of particular overhead cost pools (Hughes 8). The technique then appoints the rates to the unit prerequisites of these cost pools per item. The outcome is overhead costs that mirror the contrasting overhead necessities for the individual item (Narong 11).

ABC model was created to help administrators plan separate producing lines (Sherratt 144). The framework has been famous as assembling procedures develop advanced to improve brand identity. ABC is more costly to actualize, obliging administration to research the individual overhead prerequisites per item. By implication, administrators that prefer the ABC model should survey whether traditional costing bodes well. Traditional costing is similarly compelling under numerous circumstances. Two conceivable circumstances characterize the traditional cost method. The cost technique is suitable for organizations with low overhead cost and direct labor cost.

Works Cited

Cooper, Robin and Kaplan Robert. “How Cost Accounting Distorts Product Costs.” Management Accounting 86.15 (2010): 45-50. Print.

Compton, Ted. “Implementing Activity Based Costing.” CPA Journal 77.9 (2009): 33-34. Print.

Hicks, Douglas. Activity-Based Costing: Making It Work for Small and Mid-Sized Companies. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2002. Print.

Hughes, Andrew. “ABC/ABM – Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management: A Profitability Model for SMEs Manufacturing Clothing and Textiles in the UK.” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 9.1 (2005): 8. Print.

Narong, David. “Activity-Based Costing and Management Solutions to Traditional Short Comings of Cost Accounting.” Cost Engineering 51.8 (2009): 11. Print.

Sherratt, Matt. “Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.” Harvard Business Review 83.2 (2005): 144. Print.

Removal Request
A real student has written this essay about The Importance of Accounting and owns intellectual rights to it. If you plan to use this work for research purposes, make sure to include an according citation.
Request to Remove Content

If you are the content owner and don’t want it to be available on our website anymore, feel free to send us a removal request. We’ll fulfill it after reviewing.

Send the Request
Learn the price of your paper